For many
decades, the controversy over the content and word choice in “The Adventures of
Huckleberry Finn” has been never ending. The root of this controversy is over
the use of the word “nigger”, and weather or not it should stick in with the
book. Some have even considered changing the word to the word “slave” instead.
To me, I believe that High School students should read Huck Finn in its
entirety. You miss out on the full meaning of the novel if the content or word
choice is changed to anything other than what was originally written.
Throughout
the first half or so of the novel, Huck still feels the pressures of society on
his ideas about Jim and blacks in general. “I see it warn’t no use wasting
words, you cant learn a nigger to argue. So I quit.” (pg. 72) In the French
conversation, Jim had a logical argument against Huck and Huck didn’t acknowledge
this at all. Society here is pressuring Huck into thinking that if he cant
“[teach] a nigger to argue”, then he should just give up and “quit.” By Huck
using nigger here, you can feel the sense of hopelessness Huck has for Jim. If
you just remove the n-word here, you loose that deeper sense of hopelessness
that was intended in the first place.
Towards the end of the book after Huck and Jim have all
their adventures, Huck’s mindset on blacks changes from what it was in the previous
quote. He mentions that he “Kn[ew] he was white inside” (pg. 245). The reason
why calling Jim “white inside” is so pivotal in the novel is because, He didn’t
refer to Jim as a nigger. In not saying the n-word, it shows one of the ways
that Huck really has changed and gives the book a real “coming of age” meaning
to it. This also reinforces the fact that if you chose to switch the n-word out
with slave, you wouldn’t see as drastic as a change in Hucks demeanor towards
Jim and other blacks alike. Which
People have also argued that the n-word should not be said
at all in the context of the book, and that it is not needed. In Paul Butlers
“Why read that book?” he mentions the pain that comes with reading the n-word.
“If other teachers think keeping those epithets in is worth the pain they will
cause students of color, I understand that too.” In other words, he argues that
white people just do not understand, and will not understand the “pain they
will cause students of color”, if they choose to use the word. Even thought the
word is painful for colored people, Toni Morrison argues that the word causes
pain for both whites and blacks. “It struck me as a… kind of censorship
designed to appease adults rather than educate children. … A serious
comprehensive discussion over the term would have benefitted my class”
(Morrison pg. 1). Morrison argues that a “discussion over
the term would have [been] benefi[cial] to her 8th grade class.” Forming
your own opinions about topics such as this is very important while in High
School and College. Discussion over a difficult topic like the n-word, teaches
one to not run away from the problem, but attempt to “educate” yourself into
forming your own opinions.
In David Matthews’s “Dumbing and Numbing down Jim” article, he argues,
“There is no equivalency between slave and nigger, which is an American
invention. It’s a word that denies humanity and along with it justice and
mercy.” Here, Matthews reinforces the idea that the two words are not
interchangeable. Nigger is such more of a powerful and demeaning word than
slave because it “denies humanity.” Since the word is “an American invention”,
we feel pain and remorse from our past actions. Without this feeling, you fail to
see the bigger picture in the novel.
So what you can do as a reader is know that the word slave
and nigger are not interchangeable, because the n-word is so much more intense
in meaning than slave. Also you must realize that just because you feel pain
from the word, does not mean that you shouldn’t read it. It contributes to the
entire novel and is used to show how pressured Huck is by society, and how
drastic the change is in the end of the novel.
Butler, Paul. "Why Read That
Book?" Nytimes.com. New York Times, 6 Jan. 2011. Web. 10 Jan. 2014.
<http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/01/05/does-one-word-change-huckleberry-finn/why-bother-reading-huckleberry-finn>.
Matthews, David. "Dumbing and
Numbing Down Jim." Nytimes.com. New York Times, 6 Jan. 2011. Web.
10 Jan. 2014. <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/01/05/does-one-word-change-huckleberry-finn/dumbing-and-numbing-down-jim>.s
Twain,
Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Edited by Shelley Fisher Fiskin; introduction
by Toni Morrison, afterword by Victor Doyno. New York: Oxford University Press,
1996.
Twain, Mark. Adventures
of Huckleberry Finn. New York: Random House, 1996. Print.
the word nigger is too offensive to be read in this book. this book lacks a strong moral development for huck finn for twain to have context to use this word. huck does recognize that jim is "white inside" (twain 245) but he fails to assert that any other black is "white" or even better simply a human. huck comes to view jim as an exception to the rule of black inferiority by calling him "white inside". this means that the so acclaimed moral development of huck is non-existent and that the n-word should be removed because the removal of such a word cannot change the meaning of a book without meaning.
ReplyDeleteDavid makes a very good point. If people have such a problem with the book then take it out of the school systems then. I mean people complain about everything now and days if "we don't get our way then I'm going to complain about it until I get my way." Our society today needs to get over themselves and move on to something more important than this.
ReplyDeleteDavid I definitely agree with you that Huck Finn should be read in high schools!I like how you brought up Butler's point how whites just don't understand. I understand that it makes people uncomfortable but that is the point of using the word to show how society was like back then. Classrooms should read the original version Twain wrote and then if some kids feel uncomfortable saying it in class then they don't have to. You made a really good argument, good job!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you! Huck Finn should be read in schools regardless of language. We are young adults who have been exposed to such vulgar language, that being educated on the origin of the word is very necessary! The "n" word should not just be said on a daily basis. To learn of the word in a school setting would make students understand the times better from a southerner's point of view and from a slave's point of view. I liked your quote integration and how it flowed through your essay! I think that those quotes were necessary to your writing! Good job!
ReplyDeleteNice op-ed Dave! I agree with you that we need to discuss the issue openly and form a moral opinion just like Huck does. This will only help us in the future as we continue to challenge societal issues openly. Nice work.
ReplyDeleteConsequently, I disagree with Norm because without the n-word the reader loses so much meaning, (which has already been discussed in 100+ op-eds). Most importantly, the removal of the n-word does not allow us to realize the history of racism in our country and therefore we cannot be changed by what we read. Books are supposed to change us, and Huck Finn cannot fully do so without the "n-word".
I agree with this op-ed. Huck Finn is definitely important to be read in high school because it allows us to be exposed to this and form and discuss our own ideas about this time period. I never understood Paul Butler's op-ed because he contradicted himself. He said that when his roommate played a song with the word, he was offended by it, but then he would go and listen to something else with the word in it with his friends. I am glad you quickly came up with a counter-argument for his op-ed because Butler's reasoning was confusing to me. Nice op-ed!
ReplyDeleteYes! I totally agree that the n word is so much more powerful than the word slave. It simply makes no sense to replace the n word with slave because it does not have the same meaning, not even remotely. The n word is 10x as powerful as slave. It is not even arguable. Twain uses the n word for a reason. People need to understand this instead of being immature babies who cry that Twain is purposely trying to offend black people.
ReplyDeleteYeah David Good op ed i can agree with your idea on the n word because its a word that really shows a certain kind of meaning to the word slave. So there is no need to censor a word that adds strong meaning to the novel. People to hit the maturity level when reading this book because it might be way important to other people then it is to us. Basically if you take a way the n word your taking a way the main idea of the book.
ReplyDeleteI agree with this op ed. I liked how you used a diversity of sources to prove your point, as it made your argument more credible. I completely agree with the statement "the n-word is so much more intense in meaning than slave", and I think that this is a very important aspect to the argument of whether the book should be censored or not. I liked how you finished the op ed with your final thoughts about the ramifications of censoring the book, because it helped me get a stronger idea of your argument.
ReplyDelete